I did read the instructions... that college degree comes in handy every now and then.
The instructions are not well thought out. Someone in a cubicle in the marketing department thought of this scenario. Someone who does not shop at Lowe's or go into their stores much. It reminds me of my days at the software company. The code writers did as they were told. The user experience engineers, on the other hand, took time to understand how something should work, and then communicated the technical requirements to the coders. No user experience staff were used in the creation of this project.
If I choose to accept the assignment I will follow the guidelines. On this forum, I thought we were allowed to express our opinions about what is right or, in this case, what is wrong with the mystery shopping industry. Requiring us to expend considerable effort online to "find" an OOS - that's dumb. Why not recreate the natural way a customer experiences a product outage - an empty display, for example - to see what the employee does to help? Sometimes the employee grabs a ladder and pulls product from a higher shelf; sometimes they use a handheld device, determine it is out, and 1) find an alternative, or 2) offer to order/ship/locate it; sometimes they brush the customer off by telling them to check back on Tuesday, because that is when the truck comes.
techman01 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Did you even bother to read the scenario? That is
> not what the scenario states...It must be out of
> stock. Finding it in-stock doesn't count. If they
> find the product in-stock then you must find
> another product that is not in-stock...
>
>
> I see lots of rejections coming on this shop for
> lack of reading comprehension
Shopping since 1995; full-time since 2009. Blogging about shopping on www.myfrugalmiser.com.