Good for you, Bob. In other venues, I would agree. In this forum, however, where complaints are common, I wouldn't want a number of companies seeing me complain about their shop fees, requirements, scheduler and editor attitudes, etc.

Jamie,

I've lived in excess of 2/3 rds century and make an effort not to talk about anyone what I wouldn't talk to them. The afore typed comment is poor verbiage, but, it makes my point.

Jamiesan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BusyBeeBuzzBuzzBuzz Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > You don't need to prove that you're an editor,
> > just as you don't need to keep saying you are
> an
> > editor. =)
>
> I have received complaints for NOT saying that I'm
> an editor. That's why. (I can't please everyone at
> once .)
>

Hey I'm really sorry about that. That sucks.

No, you can't please everyone at once, but there's no need to even try to do that.

> > True to a certain extent. However, as far as I
> > can see, you are the only poster who keeps
> > bringing up that she is an editor when it
> doesn't
> > seem to be necessary. Why?
>
>
> Ditto my above comment.
>

Hmmm. I think I understand the situation better now. Don't have a solution, though.

>
> > I actually agree with many of your posts on
> > grammar, etc. I just don't understand what's
> the
> > purpose of saying you are an editor in some of
> > your posts unless you are employing argument
> from
> > authority. If that is the purpose, then it is
> > important for you to establish that you are
> indeed
> > an editor and thus an authority whose opinion
> has
> > more weight than that of "just" a shopper.
>
>
> Well, maybe you can just think of me as someone
> who knows good grammar, punctuation, sentence
> structure, etc.
>

I do already. =)

>
> > I am one of the forum members who are
> interested
> > in what you have to say.
>
>
> Thank you. I appreciate it.
>

You're welcome. I meant what I said.

> >As I said, I agree with
> > many of your posts. I just don't understand
> why
> > you keep bringing up you are an editor.
>
> Again, I have received complaints for NOT saying
> that I'm an editor, so I have said it on almost
> every post since I was chastised. I also have
> since put it into a signature, so I don't have to
> say it.

OK. Got it.

Thanks, BusyBeeBuzzBuzzBuzz.

You're welcome, Jamie. =D

This string started with a complaint by me. Since then, I have made peace with Service Sleuth. Chalk it up to a tragedy of errors.

Azernie,

You may wish to chalk the matter up to a tragedy of errors, I can certainly understand your wish, but if this MSC ever awards you another assignment after what you've posted, it would surprise me.

That's probably the reason she edited out her post. If she's lucky, they never saw it.

I have shopped Service Sleuth many times and I am very happy with them.

AustinMom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's probably the reason she edited out her
> post. If she's lucky, they never saw it.


The post can still be read since it has been quoted in a respondant's post.

Bay Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> AustinMom Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > That's probably the reason she edited out her
> > post. If she's lucky, they never saw it.
>
>
> The post can still be read since it has been
> quoted in a respondant's post.


Yes. There's not much point deleting your post once it has been quoted. Some posters believe when they change their post, it will change everywhere it has been quoted. It won't.

Ahh... If only life had an undo button.