@Shop-et-al wrote:
How do your theorists explain the low incidence of the disease and high rate of recovery in this rural place? Even vulnerable populations such as those in assisted living situations are surviving the dratted disease here!
This is a guess, Shop-et-al, but:
a.) Low incidence is due to different states having their own growth curves.
The virus hit NY hardest, because of international flights to Europe (genetic testing has shown most of NY's cases came from there), where COVID-19 seemed to take root more after leaving China. Their densely populated cityscapes and public transportation made it easy to spread. Plus, people in the U.S. (including me) took it lightly early on.
Rural areas probably have less international travelers and are more spread out in terrain. Their location away from the epicenters may provide more time before it gets to rural areas. But, I would prepare for it. Just as flu gets to rural areas, I'm guessing so too will COVID-19.
b.) Not sure about the high rate of recovery in rural areas. There are theories about viral load that I've seen differing opinions on. One theory is that the more particles of the virus you get into your system, the more deadly it can be to you. Those who get less particles may have less complications. Perhaps in urban areas, where there are numerous multiple (esp., asymptomatic) spreaders who are within close contact with each other, the viral loads may be higher than in other areas.
Some speculate that doctors and healthcare workers getting very sick can be attributed to high viral loads from seeing COVID-19 patients all day. It makes logical sense, but I don't think we know enough to say for sure.
I think the main thing is that rural areas may not have been "tested" yet with COVID-19 outbreaks. The distance from big cities may have afforded you all more time. But, that is reason to definitely learn from the lessons of Wuhan, Italy, and NYC.
Take precautions now! (((HUG)))
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 04/25/2020 03:11AM by shoptastic.